[Download] "Creten v. Chicago" by Supreme Court of Kansas # eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

eBook details
- Title: Creten v. Chicago
- Author : Supreme Court of Kansas
- Release Date : January 11, 1959
- Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
- Pages : * pages
- Size : 63 KB
Description
The opinion of the court was delivered by  This was an action for damages arising out of the collision
            between a Rock Island passenger train and an irrigation pump
            mounted on a two-wheel trailer owned by the plaintiff, Arthur
            Creten. George Scott, Marvin LaRue, the Union Pacific Railroad
            Company and the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company
            were named defendants. Service of summons was not made on Scott
            and neither he nor LaRue were operating the train at the time of
            the collision. LaRue's demurrer to plaintiff's evidence was
            sustained and the propriety of that ruling is not before us. The
            jury returned a verdict for plaintiff and against the Chicago,
            Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company (defendant), and did not
            find the Union Pacific guilty of negligence. Following the
            overruling of post-trial motions, the defendant has appealed.   Summarized in part, the allegations of the amended petition
            were that on July 4, 1954, the defendant and Union Pacific
            jointly owned, maintained and operated tracks and crossings in
            Wyandotte County, Kansas, and operated trains thereon; that one
            such crossing was located on the south side of Kansas Highway 32,
            which runs parallel to the railroad right of way about a mile
            east of Muncie, which was built and established by defendant and
            Union Pacific some 30 years ago as a private crossing, but since
            then has been used by the public generally and by the plaintiff
            to gain access to a field which he rented on the south side of
            the tracks; that on the day in question the defendants were
            maintaining the crossing, but it was in a state of disrepair and
            had been for many months in that there were large holes and
            depressions between the planks and rails, and that defendants
            knew or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known it
            was in such a state.